Where 'one UI for everyone' breaks down
The patterns we see in commerce, SaaS, and content products — and the design and ML shape of the answer.
What we ship, by the person on the hook for the surface
Six capabilities. One personalization core.
The variant tree is a contract between design and engineering. The resolver is a contract between product and ML.
Signal → resolver → variant → render
Five lanes, one feedback loop. The resolver is the seam between your data and your design system.
Events, session, profile, live state — stitched into a first-party identity graph that respects per-region consent.
Derive features → score → policy → assign experiment. Edge-or-origin. <30ms. Cacheable by segment.
Per-component slots designers own. WCAG-checked. Reverts at the slot, not the page.
Web, mobile, email — same tree. Telemetry feeds the eval harness; a true holdout is always reserved.
From audit to multi-surface in roughly 10 weeks
Each phase ends with something live, measured, and reversible.
Audit & frame
We map your surfaces, the segments hidden in your data, and the metrics that actually matter — past CTR.
Pilot one surface
We pick the highest-leverage surface (usually onboarding or hero) and ship a variant tree + resolver against a true holdout.
Expand to channels
Same segments, same tree — extended to mobile, email, and inbox. Consent rules tightened. Trace ledger live.
Handover & scale
Your team adds new variant slots without us. We stay light-touch on the resolver and eval pipeline.
Edge-first. Designer-friendly. Privacy-default.
Built on the durable open-source pieces, with first-party data flowing end-to-end.
What changes after the resolver ships
Aggregated across adaptive-UX engagements over the last 18 months.